Une solution globale pour soulager la biosphère

Autonomie locale et production d'énergie

This line of thought features hardened into the another type of orthodoxy

This line of thought features hardened into the another type of orthodoxy

See the creepy method in which new spin-dos graviton – totally unobserved in nature – are gradually promoted when you look at the stature as Zee experiences the publication, ending up the origin stone off conventional physics, sequence principle:

‘Sequence idea has got the superior assets out-of forecasting [spin-2] gravity.’ – Professor Edward Witten (M-concept originator), ‘Reflections for the Future regarding Spacetime’, Physics Today, April 1996.

« Going back eighteen decades particle idea could have been controlled of the an individual method to new unification of Practical Design interactions and you may quantum the law of gravity. It is a striking proven fact that there is absolutely no research at all for it advanced and you can unappealing conjectural concept. There is not actually a significant proposition for what the newest figure of your fundamental ‘M-theory’ is meant to feel otherwise any excuse anyway so you can accept that their fictional character do develop vacuum pressure condition into wanted functions. The sole dispute essentially given to justify it image of brand new business is the fact perturbative string ideas features a massless twist a couple setting which means that you certainly will promote a reason from the law of gravity, if an individual previously been able to look for an underlying principle which perturbative sequence idea ‘s the perturbative extension. » [Emphasis added.]

The result of Witten’s twist-2 graviton therapy (followed from the string theorists without the reservations) would be the fact when i registered a paper to help you Classical and you will Quantum Gravity ten years before (by the post), new publisher delivered it to own ‘peer-review’ and you will received a rejection decision from the a private ‘referee’ and this the guy sent in my opinion, merely unaware attack hence forgotten the newest physics entirely and only advertised it was completely wrong because it don’t connect with new twist-2 graviton out-of sequence concept!

Now, as to why have so it sweet legitimate man nonetheless not wrote his physically supported evidence of what is actually an excellent « already acknowledged » prediction to the fuel of the law of gravity? Usually the guy actually ever do it?

Into the November 1964, the entire year ahead of choosing this new Nobel alt Prize to own path integrals, Feynman gave a number of lectures from the Cornell School to your ‘The Profile out of Real Law’, which were shot of the BBC having sign toward BBC2 Tv during the 1965

« . along with the dimensionality question, brand new string idea method is (up to now, inside most respects) limited to getting simply good perturbation theory. »

Richard P. Feynman highlights on the Feynman Lectures with the Gravitation, page 30, you to definitely gravitons need not be twist-2, that has never been observed! Despite this, the censorship of your issues by the conventional « stringy » theorists lasts:

‘Do not anticipate one to take a look at the paper in detail, or check if the work is right, however you is check that the papers is appropriate for the topic town. .. should your tasks are completely disconnected which have latest [sequence principle] work in the area.’

They will not wanted any strong evidence of dissent. So it selection implies that this new arxiv shows pro-mainstream bias. It delivers away a strong warning message that if you require to get a researcher, try not to heckle the fresh new conventional otherwise work might possibly be removed.

For the 2002 I didn’t rating a single short-term papers on the an insane-searching but really predictive design onto arxiv through my college association (you will find not any other approval called for at that time). In emailed correspondence they said to go rating my personal websites basically was not adding to conventional [stringy] info.

Do not promote the author

Now let us take a look at exactly what Feynman (1918-88) states regarding it method. New transcript could have been authored due to the fact a text by the BBC inside 1965 and MIT force within the 1967, ‘The Reputation of Bodily Rules,’ that’s still in print due to the fact a book regarding Penguin Books during the The united kingdomt.

Laisser un commentaire