† Without and with adjustment for BMI. Simple adjusted includes covariates for registry site (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), with and without BMI (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ).
‡ Fully adjusted model includes covariates for registry (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), BMI (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ), mode of detection (screen-detected, interval-detected, other screen, clinically detected, other), surgery/radiation (no breast surgery, breast conserving therapy without radiation, breast conserving therapy with radiation, other surgery), chemotherapy (yes/no), and annual median income (<$42 000, $42 000 – <$52 000, $52 000 – <$66 000, ?$66 000). Women with missing covariate information were excluded.
§ P really worth regarding Wald figure to check having an overall impact out-of categorical BI-RADS occurrence. Every statistical evaluation was two-sided.
Though BI-RADS thickness don’t tailor danger of breast cancer passing when you look at the link to almost every other pathological issues, women that have BI-RADS 1 density had a tendency to feel the large exposure, in any stratum
¶ AJCC phase is included while the a categorical covariate in the habits with all level joint, with and without phase IV.
Endurance design outcomes for the relatives ranging from mammographic thickness and you may risk of breast cancer passing, full and also by AJCC stage*
* AJCC = American Mutual Panel for the Cancers; BI-RADS = Nipple Imaging Revealing and you will Study Program; Body mass index = body mass index; CI = believe interval; Hours = hazard ratio. N = 96 people omitted regarding the produce-specific habits.
† Without and with adjustment for BMI. Simple adjusted includes covariates for registry site (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44 https://datingranking.net/pl/lavalife-recenzja/, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), with and without BMI (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ).
‡ Fully adjusted model includes covariates for registry (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), BMI (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ), mode of detection (screen-detected, interval-detected, other screen, clinically detected, other), surgery/radiation (no breast surgery, breast conserving therapy without radiation, breast conserving therapy with radiation, other surgery), chemotherapy (yes/no), and annual median income (<$42 000, $42 000 – <$52 000, $52 000 – <$66 000, ?$66 000). Women with missing covariate information were excluded.
§ P worth of Wald figure to check having an overall total feeling out-of categorical BI-RADS occurrence. Most of the analytical screening were a couple of-sided.
Even in the event BI-RADS density failed to personalize chance of breast cancer dying in the relationship to other pathological facts, ladies with BI-RADS step one occurrence tended to feel the high exposure, in virtually any stratum
¶ AJCC stage is roofed as good categorical covariate in activities with most of the amount combined, that have and you will rather than stage IV.
Among female having tumors of at least dos.0cm, BI-RADS step 1 density try in the an elevated threat of breast disease death (Hr = step one.55, 95% CI = 1.fourteen to 2.09; P = .003 getting overall effect of BI-RADS thickness; Dining table 4). Ladies who had one another BI-RADS step one density and you can high-levels tumors had a heightened likelihood of cancer of the breast demise (Time = step 1.45, 95% CI = step 1.05 to dos.02; P = .thirteen to own overall effect of density).
Success design outcomes for this new relation ranging from mammographic thickness and you will chance off breast cancer passing, stratified by tumefaction functions, AJCC amounts We–IV joint*
* N = 96 women excluded from cause-specific models. Fully adjusted model includes covariates for AJCC stage (I, IIA, IIB, III, IV), registry (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), body mass index (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ), mode of detection (screen-detected, interval-detected, other screen, clinically detected, other), surgery/radiation (no breast surgery, breast conserving therapy without radiation, breast conserving therapy with radiation, other surgery), chemotherapy (yes/no), and annual median income (<$42 000, $42 000 – <$52 000, $52 000 – <$66 000, ?$66 000). Women with missing covariate information were excluded. AJCC = American Joint Committee on Cancer; BI-RADS = Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System; CI = confidence interval; ER = estrogen receptor; HR = hazard ratio; PR = progesterone receptor.